Timeline for What's the resolution of gravitational time dilation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2023 at 4:38 | vote | accept | Jaime Caffarel | ||
| Oct 7, 2023 at 20:24 | comment | added | Ghoster | Related: Is spacetime discrete or continuous? | |
| Oct 7, 2023 at 19:04 | comment | added | Ghoster | There is no evidence that the Planck length is the smallest length. And in General Relativity, the theory that predicts gravitational time dilation, there is no theoretical smallest length. | |
| Oct 7, 2023 at 18:46 | answer | added | John Doty | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 7, 2023 at 18:15 | answer | added | JEB | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 7, 2023 at 17:52 | comment | added | Jaime Caffarel | @Ghoster I think that gravitational time dilation varies smoothly, but not infinitely smoothly. I mean, I assume that the distance "d" from my question cannot be smaller than the Plank length, but I was thinking if it might be at least a little bit greater. Sorry if the question was not clear. | |
| Oct 7, 2023 at 16:25 | comment | added | Ghoster | Gravitational force varies smoothly with distance. Gravitational potential varies smoothly with distance. Why would gravitational time dilation not do the same? | |
| S Oct 7, 2023 at 15:25 | review | First questions | |||
| Oct 7, 2023 at 15:32 | |||||
| S Oct 7, 2023 at 15:25 | history | asked | Jaime Caffarel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |