Timeline for Deriving the Coulomb force equation from the idea of virtual photon exchange?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:19 | comment | added | Miyase | This does not provide an answer to the question. Once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post; instead, provide answers that don't require clarification from the asker. - From Review | |
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:17 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:19 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:16 | comment | added | Andrew | I don't understand why you say that the "1/r" potential for gravity is "aesthetically pleasing" because you can derive it from Einstein's equations, while you say that the "1/r" potential for electostatics is "arbitrary" despite the fact that it can be derived from Maxwell's equations. | |
| S Sep 28, 2023 at 16:59 | review | First answers | |||
| Sep 28, 2023 at 17:18 | |||||
| S Sep 28, 2023 at 16:59 | history | answered | miiser | CC BY-SA 4.0 |