Timeline for Why should the shape of the surface affect the flux in Faraday's law?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2023 at 10:31 | comment | added | Aadhaar Murty | Should I delete this question? I mean it's mostly about my brain fade rather than a conceptual problem :) | |
| Sep 26, 2023 at 10:30 | comment | added | Aadhaar Murty | I got it - I was just reading the proof wrong. By 'time-dependent' surface Wikipedia meant that the surface changes because the LOOP is moving. | |
| Sep 26, 2023 at 10:23 | comment | added | Aadhaar Murty | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday%27s_law_of_induction#Proof - Take this derivation from Wikipedia for example. | |
| Sep 26, 2023 at 10:19 | comment | added | Aadhaar Murty | Exactly - that's where my confusion is...if we already KNOW that the flux only depends on the boundary curves then why do all these proofs even the case when the surface itself is time-dependent? Surely it's obvious that the flux won't be effected ass long as the the shape of the loop loop is left the same. | |
| Sep 26, 2023 at 8:28 | history | answered | AfterShave | CC BY-SA 4.0 |