Timeline for Is there a proof from the first principle that the Lagrangian $L = T - V$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 11 at 9:54 | history | suggested | Bml | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed typos in grammar; fixed syntax/punctuation; fixed links http -> https; minor facultative MathJax improvement.
|
| Oct 11 at 9:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 11 at 9:54 | |||||
| Jan 8 at 7:47 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Hi @Matt Hanson. Thanks for the feedback. See e.g. Goldstein, chapter 1. | |
| Jan 7 at 18:20 | comment | added | Matt Hanson | This is a fantastically interesting response, but as I’m reading it I’m not sure how you derive the “key identity.” | |
| Feb 29, 2020 at 7:57 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 23, 2013 at 0:59 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Sep 22, 2013 at 14:00 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation
|
| Sep 22, 2013 at 1:01 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 66 characters in body
|
| Sep 22, 2013 at 0:55 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |