Timeline for WKB method as a Semiclassical Approach
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 28 at 19:25 | answer | added | Roger V. | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 28 at 19:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Sep 17, 2023 at 19:15 | comment | added | user267839 | @Quillo: ok, but the Schrödinger equation which we try to solve there is intrinsically " non classical". So say we solve it using WKB and we let then $h \to 0$. Which pure classical result(s) we would then recover from this? ( if I understand your concern correctly then "semiclassical" means in this approach that performing $h \to 0$ provides something what we know from classical mechanics, but which result is it?) | |
Sep 17, 2023 at 18:56 | comment | added | Quillo | Taylor around $h=0$ is an expansion around the classical limit, hence the name "semiclassical". | |
Sep 17, 2023 at 17:22 | comment | added | user267839 | yes sure, but what does it mean here to be "semiclassical"? I' m not sure if calling an approach to be semiclassical is really equivalent to the possibility to expand a system ( more precisely the action S) in Taylor series in $/hbar$... | |
Sep 16, 2023 at 18:36 | history | became hot network question | |||
Sep 16, 2023 at 15:55 | comment | added | Quillo | More here: physics.stackexchange.com/q/417877/226902 (the idea is that $h$ is treated as a small parameter) | |
Sep 16, 2023 at 13:18 | history | edited | user267839 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 14 characters in body
|
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:50 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:40 | history | edited | user267839 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 338 characters in body
|
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:39 | answer | added | LolloBoldo | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:33 | history | asked | user267839 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |