Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 28 at 19:25 answer added Roger V. timeline score: 1
Nov 28 at 19:07 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 17, 2023 at 19:15 comment added user267839 @Quillo: ok, but the Schrödinger equation which we try to solve there is intrinsically " non classical". So say we solve it using WKB and we let then $h \to 0$. Which pure classical result(s) we would then recover from this? ( if I understand your concern correctly then "semiclassical" means in this approach that performing $h \to 0$ provides something what we know from classical mechanics, but which result is it?)
Sep 17, 2023 at 18:56 comment added Quillo Taylor around $h=0$ is an expansion around the classical limit, hence the name "semiclassical".
Sep 17, 2023 at 17:22 comment added user267839 yes sure, but what does it mean here to be "semiclassical"? I' m not sure if calling an approach to be semiclassical is really equivalent to the possibility to expand a system ( more precisely the action S) in Taylor series in $/hbar$...
Sep 16, 2023 at 18:36 history became hot network question
Sep 16, 2023 at 15:55 comment added Quillo More here: physics.stackexchange.com/q/417877/226902 (the idea is that $h$ is treated as a small parameter)
Sep 16, 2023 at 13:18 history edited user267839 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 14 characters in body
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:50 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:40 history edited user267839 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 338 characters in body
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:39 answer added LolloBoldo timeline score: 0
Sep 16, 2023 at 10:33 history asked user267839 CC BY-SA 4.0