Timeline for Reference for mathematics of quantum mechanics with infinite degrees of freedom?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2023 at 18:25 | comment | added | MBlrd | @ACuriousMind yes please. I understand that path integral approach is also very popular, but I would prefer the algebraic approach if possible | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:34 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | But you are specifically looking at $C^\ast$-algebraic approaches? Because for instance Glimm and Jaffe's Quantum Physics is a mathematically rigorous look at quantum field theory but it uses the point of view of path integrals, not of operator algebras. I'm not sure if this within the scope of material you're asking for here or not from how the question is currently written | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:22 | comment | added | MBlrd | @Bababeluma thank you, I will have a look! | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:22 | history | edited | MBlrd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved the description of the problem
|
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:19 | comment | added | MBlrd | @ACuriousMind Thank you for your question, I wanted to match the name of the mathematical approach that I have seen in books, expressed in terms of C* algebras. But I think you are right, the two should be the same. Just to clarify: I am not looking specifically at relativistic quantum field theory | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:14 | comment | added | Bababeluma | In case this is what you're looking for, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by Von Neumann. | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:07 | history | notice added | Qmechanic♦ | Book Recommendation | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:07 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags; Post Made Community Wiki
|
|
| Sep 9, 2023 at 12:02 | comment | added | ACuriousMind♦ | Is there a specific reason you're saying "quantum mechanics with infinite degrees of freedom" and not "quantum field theory"? | |
| Sep 9, 2023 at 11:56 | history | asked | MBlrd | CC BY-SA 4.0 |