Skip to main content
added 77 characters in body
Source Link
Kyle Kanos
  • 28.8k
  • 41
  • 69
  • 135

As per this book, An Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei by Bradley Peterson: "The nuclear emission must last more than 10^8 years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. This is a simple argument. One extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe (10^10 years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases) - since 1 spiral in 100 is currently in the Seyfert phase, it must last of order 1010 / 100 = 10^8 years."

The nuclear emission must last more than $10^8$ years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. This is a simple argument. One extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe ($10^{10}$ years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases) - since 1 spiral in 100 is currently in the Seyfert phase, it must last of order $10^{10} / 100 = 10^8$ years.

I can't seem to grasp this justification for the age of nuclear emissions. Could someone explain?

As per this book: "The nuclear emission must last more than 10^8 years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. This is a simple argument. One extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe (10^10 years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases) - since 1 spiral in 100 is currently in the Seyfert phase, it must last of order 1010 / 100 = 10^8 years."

I can't seem to grasp this justification for the age of nuclear emissions. Could someone explain?

As per this book, An Introduction to Active Galactic Nuclei by Bradley Peterson:

The nuclear emission must last more than $10^8$ years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. This is a simple argument. One extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe ($10^{10}$ years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases) - since 1 spiral in 100 is currently in the Seyfert phase, it must last of order $10^{10} / 100 = 10^8$ years.

I can't seem to grasp this justification for the age of nuclear emissions. Could someone explain?

Source Link

Seyfert Galaxies: How does this statistical deduction about the age of their nucleus make sense?

As per this book: "The nuclear emission must last more than 10^8 years, because Seyfert galaxies constitute about 1 in 100 spiral galaxies. This is a simple argument. One extreme scenario is that galaxies which are Seyferts are always Seyferts, in which case their lifetime is the age of the Universe (10^10 years). The opposite extreme is one where all spirals pass through a Seyfert phase (or phases) - since 1 spiral in 100 is currently in the Seyfert phase, it must last of order 1010 / 100 = 10^8 years."

I can't seem to grasp this justification for the age of nuclear emissions. Could someone explain?