Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 9, 2023 at 11:22 vote accept user3423423
Jun 5, 2023 at 9:31 comment added khaxan Isn't this the exact same problem?
Jun 5, 2023 at 5:54 history removed from network questions Qmechanic
Jun 4, 2023 at 22:48 comment added MaximusIdeal It seems tension is not constant throughout a non-massless rope: physics.stackexchange.com/q/339000 physics.stackexchange.com/q/562547
Jun 4, 2023 at 19:53 history became hot network question
Jun 4, 2023 at 17:42 answer added mmesser314 timeline score: 6
Jun 4, 2023 at 16:03 comment added Solomon Slow In fact, the problem says, "massless rope." That's giving you permission to ignore its inertia.
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:23 answer added Dale timeline score: 12
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:19 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:16 answer added user3423423 timeline score: 4
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:06 comment added user3423423 Oh, I see: when the mass is very small, some amount of resultant force will in fact be present (part of the force applied by the person is expended on the rope, and part on the block), and the rope will accelerate as expected.
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:03 comment added Amit Welcome! I think that you could have saved the intermediate steps, and immediately conclude that the sum of forces acting on a massless rope is $0$ because $ma$=$0a$=$0$! It seems to me then that the culprit is applying Newton's second law to an idealized massless rope. Perhaps this post can help you in this regard
S Jun 4, 2023 at 11:53 review First questions
Jun 4, 2023 at 12:03
S Jun 4, 2023 at 11:53 history asked user3423423 CC BY-SA 4.0