Timeline for Does the current form of non-perturbative QFT make all the same predictions as perturbative QFT, or is it incomplete?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2023 at 2:42 | comment | added | The_Sympathizer | And this brings me once more to the chronic stickler question: without "rigorous" QFT or, more appropriately, without a rigorous formulation of the Standard Model, to what extent are claims that it can account for "all known physics" justified versus similar claims for other, rigorously-formulated theories when confined to their claimed domains of applicability - particularly "in the wild" physics outside of the very specific situation of a particle accelerator? | |
| S May 24, 2023 at 6:32 | history | edited | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected a few grammar and spelling errors
|
| S May 24, 2023 at 6:32 | history | suggested | Mikayla Eckel Cifrese | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected a few grammar and spelling errors
|
| May 24, 2023 at 2:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 24, 2023 at 6:32 | |||||
| May 23, 2023 at 22:04 | vote | accept | Mikayla Eckel Cifrese | ||
| May 23, 2023 at 21:53 | history | edited | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 401 characters in body
|
| May 23, 2023 at 21:47 | history | answered | ACuriousMind♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |