Timeline for Star product of two commuting spinors
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8 at 14:13 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor formatting
|
| Apr 5, 2023 at 18:37 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor formatting
|
| Sep 8, 2013 at 20:46 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation about integrability
|
| Sep 8, 2013 at 13:03 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
discussing integrability
|
| Sep 7, 2013 at 23:10 | vote | accept | Bilentor | ||
| Sep 8, 2013 at 11:55 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2013 at 11:47 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation
|
| Sep 7, 2013 at 8:28 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected index
|
| Sep 7, 2013 at 8:07 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 22:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added explanation
|
| Sep 6, 2013 at 22:10 | comment | added | Bilentor | Thanks a lot for the detailed and explicit derivation. I had already used that formula to get the answer but I was wondering if I was using the integral formula wrong as I wasn't getting the answer. It just seemed odd to me that the paper will have the integral version and right below it the star bracket without any mention of how it should be used or not. | |
| Sep 6, 2013 at 22:07 | history | answered | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |