Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 22, 2023 at 9:24 history edited user3384598 CC BY-SA 4.0
added missing article
May 20, 2023 at 10:06 comment added user3384598 Exactly, that's the idea. However, this reasoning suggests that you need only the solutions of the same order $\alpha_x+\alpha_y+\alpha_z=l$ -- something fishy is going on, but I'm not sure where the issue is! Finally, the spherical components of a tensor (indexed like spherical harmonics) are defined as a representation that "behaves like" spherical harmonics when undergoing rotations. (See, for example, §3.11 in J. J. Sakurai, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed.)
May 19, 2023 at 18:40 comment added Ulysses Zhan Thank you for answering! Can I understand your argument as the following? The field $f_{(\alpha_x,\alpha_y,\alpha_z)}$ due to each multipole moment component is expressable using the linear combination of $2l+1$ linearly-independent functions $f_{(l,m)}$, so the multipole momenet components only have $2l+1$ independent ones. Also, could you please explain about the "spherical tensors" that Jackson mentioned?
May 19, 2023 at 12:53 review Late answers
May 19, 2023 at 13:40
S May 19, 2023 at 12:32 review First answers
May 19, 2023 at 13:52
S May 19, 2023 at 12:32 history answered user3384598 CC BY-SA 4.0