Timeline for Will my Green's function approximation be any good?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2023 at 15:53 | history | edited | Mauricio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Apr 4, 2023 at 14:55 | answer | added | Cosmas Zachos | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 4, 2023 at 10:05 | history | edited | Blueberry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2023 at 9:18 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Apr 4, 2023 at 9:02 | comment | added | Blueberry | Hi, I have added additional information in my question showing how I arrived at a solution using $H$. Hopefully I have not made a mistake anywhere! | |
| Apr 4, 2023 at 8:58 | history | edited | Blueberry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add additional details of my calculation in response to a comment
|
| Apr 3, 2023 at 22:22 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | Huh? your antisymmetric trial H fails to yield a diagonal r.h.s., let alone an identity. Why don't you take an ansatz ((a,b),(-b,c)) and solve for the operators a,b,c ? | |
| Apr 3, 2023 at 19:42 | history | edited | Blueberry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 155 characters in body
|
| Apr 3, 2023 at 19:34 | history | asked | Blueberry | CC BY-SA 4.0 |