Timeline for Why don't we get infinite energy from a continous emission spectrum?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 2, 2023 at 16:10 | history | reopened |
jng224 Michael Seifert John Rennie |
||
Mar 1, 2023 at 22:49 | comment | added | jng224 | Voting to reopen since this is quite clearly a conceptual question and not homework-like. | |
Mar 1, 2023 at 22:48 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Mar 2, 2023 at 16:10 | |||||
Mar 1, 2023 at 15:33 | history | closed |
Roger V. Miyase Jon Custer |
Not suitable for this site | |
Mar 1, 2023 at 12:09 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 1, 2023 at 15:33 | |||||
Mar 1, 2023 at 11:51 | comment | added | Roger V. | it means that spectral density is an integrable function. Just because a function is continuous doesn't mean that its integral should be infinite. | |
Feb 28, 2023 at 22:17 | comment | added | Ross Millikan | @DKNguyen: no, it is not the ultraviolet catastrophe. It is just looking at the infinite number of real numbers in a given range. There is no distribution with frequency described. | |
Feb 28, 2023 at 18:43 | history | became hot network question | |||
Feb 28, 2023 at 13:42 | answer | added | Anders Sandberg | timeline score: 17 | |
Feb 28, 2023 at 13:08 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 28, 2023 at 12:54 | answer | added | Hans Wurst | timeline score: 3 | |
Feb 28, 2023 at 12:08 | answer | added | Noct | timeline score: 6 | |
Feb 28, 2023 at 10:58 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags; edited tags
|
|
S Feb 28, 2023 at 10:43 | review | First questions | |||
Feb 28, 2023 at 11:07 | |||||
S Feb 28, 2023 at 10:43 | history | asked | Hououin Kyouma | CC BY-SA 4.0 |