Timeline for On finding geodesics in general relativity
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 23:39 | history | edited | peek-a-boo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed another typo
|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 23:13 | history | edited | peek-a-boo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed formatting error
|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 23:07 | vote | accept | Integral fan | ||
| Feb 19, 2023 at 20:34 | history | edited | peek-a-boo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 398 characters in body
|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 20:29 | comment | added | peek-a-boo | Also, in Schwarzschild, say, we often look for radial geodesics, so the $R$-component being non-vanishing isn’t that big of a deal. If it does vanish, then I think in this special case, one can verify the last remaining component of the geodesic equation directly (I remember thinking about this once, but I lost my calculations lol, and don’t feel like repeating them… but it shouldn’t be too hard). | |
| Feb 19, 2023 at 20:28 | history | edited | peek-a-boo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 398 characters in body
|
| Feb 19, 2023 at 20:22 | history | answered | peek-a-boo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |