Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 2, 2023 at 8:16 comment added Tobias Fünke To expand my previous comment: With $X$ as a multiplication and $P$ as a derivative (up to constants) operator. Essentially, this boils down to the fact that states with definite momentum are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator (by definition).
Feb 2, 2023 at 8:06 comment added Tobias Fünke Well, if you accept that $[X,P]=i \hbar I$, then you can derive that $\langle x|p\rangle =: \psi_p(x) =\ldots$... It is an easy exercise
Feb 2, 2023 at 8:03 comment added CBBAM @TobiasFünke I haven't, my curiosity was more towards where this equation came from in the first place and if it had any physical or mathematical motivation.
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:57 comment added Tobias Fünke Have you tried to solve the corresponding SE?
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:55 vote accept CBBAM
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:55 comment added CBBAM @TobiasFünke Yes, non-relativistic.
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:45 comment added Tobias Fünke In which context? In (non-relativistic) QM?
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:37 answer added John Rennie timeline score: 1
Feb 2, 2023 at 7:00 comment added Rhino Also, it is the solution to Schrodinger's equation and, actually, also other more general relativistic wave equations.
Feb 2, 2023 at 6:30 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Feb 2, 2023 at 6:23 comment added march Well, $\lambda = h/p= 2\pi\hbar/p$ is de-Broglie. After that, you're just writing down the general expression for a plane wave with that wavelength. So the reason that we write that wave function down is that it's essentially the same as de-Broglie's hypothesis, and in the end (after a tortuous path) it matches experimental realities.
Feb 2, 2023 at 6:20 history asked CBBAM CC BY-SA 4.0