Timeline for Ising model rescaling
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2023 at 21:26 | vote | accept | QCD_IS_GOOD | ||
| S Feb 1, 2023 at 21:26 | history | bounty ended | QCD_IS_GOOD | ||
| S Feb 1, 2023 at 21:26 | history | notice removed | QCD_IS_GOOD | ||
| Feb 1, 2023 at 21:12 | answer | added | Gec | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 30, 2023 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1619893289678684160 | ||
| S Jan 30, 2023 at 1:07 | history | bounty started | QCD_IS_GOOD | ||
| S Jan 30, 2023 at 1:07 | history | notice added | QCD_IS_GOOD | Draw attention | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 15:44 | comment | added | QCD_IS_GOOD | @YvanVelenik I didn't realise the limit would probably be zero; I've 'renormalized' my correlation function now so hopefully it's nonzero. I'll take a look at the review paper and see if I can write down the answer, thanks | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 15:43 | history | edited | QCD_IS_GOOD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Hopefully more precise version of the qustion: so that the correlation function is normalized hopefully to be nonzero
|
| Jan 28, 2023 at 9:36 | comment | added | Yvan Velenik | I don't think you have written what you had in mind: if $i\neq j$, the limit will be equal to zero, since the distance between the spins diverges. Of course the gist of your question is clear, although stating the results is not so obvious. For instance, read §3 in this review paper. | |
| Jan 28, 2023 at 1:01 | history | edited | QCD_IS_GOOD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
miswrote the correlation length definition
|
| Jan 28, 2023 at 0:46 | history | asked | QCD_IS_GOOD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |