Timeline for Time reversal symmetry on bilinears
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24 at 2:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 24 at 6:54 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 6 at 8:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 23, 2023 at 19:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 25, 2023 at 20:01 | answer | added | Mark | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2023 at 23:28 | comment | added | Monopole | It is in the Dirac basis so it's real. | |
| Jan 16, 2023 at 21:47 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | is $\gamma^5$ purely imaginary? what basis are you using? | |
| Jan 15, 2023 at 23:02 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | As long as you are aware that your definition of T is neither $\hat T$, nor T of Chapter 11 of M Schwartz's QFT text. He goes painstakingly illustrating the point, and your very first formula has an extra i which turns around to bite you. | |
| Jan 14, 2023 at 23:21 | history | edited | Monopole | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Title-related
|
| Jan 14, 2023 at 23:01 | history | edited | Monopole | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved the content
|
| Jan 14, 2023 at 22:40 | history | asked | Monopole | CC BY-SA 4.0 |