Timeline for Zener breakdown - a quantum mechanical derivation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 26, 2022 at 10:56 | history | edited | SchrodingersCat |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 24, 2022 at 19:57 | answer | added | grjj3 | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 24, 2022 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1606666007573053440 | ||
Dec 24, 2022 at 14:18 | history | edited | grjj3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1227 characters in body
|
Dec 24, 2022 at 14:11 | comment | added | grjj3 | Indeed, that was my initial approach (getting rid of the vanishingly small $\kappa^4$ is reasonable and greatly simplifies the calculation), however it still doesn't yield the correct result. Moreover, you are still left with terms like $\frac{G^{2}\hbar^{2}}{4m}$ and $\frac{G^{4}\hbar^{4}}{64m^{2}\mathcal{E}^{0}}$ that shouldn't be omitted, but even if we do omit them I still fail to retrieve the desired result. | |
Dec 24, 2022 at 12:52 | comment | added | Sebastian Riese | My approach would be to analyze the order of the terms in the quadratic equation and omit the ones that are small (e.g. the $\kappa^4$ term is negligible for sufficiently small $\kappa$). You can probably arrive at the same expression by reducing the solutions of the quadratic equation under those assumptions – (e.g. the $\hbar^2\epsilon /m$ term can be omitted if $\epsilon \ll \mathcal{E}^0$). | |
Dec 24, 2022 at 12:47 | history | edited | grjj3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 24, 2022 at 12:41 | history | asked | grjj3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |