Skip to main content

Timeline for scrap iron for stopping a meltdown

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 30, 2014 at 10:46 answer added MSalters timeline score: 0
Apr 30, 2014 at 4:29 answer added LDC3 timeline score: -2
Dec 1, 2013 at 10:21 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/407092031379734528
Oct 31, 2013 at 11:19 answer added user2617804 timeline score: 1
Aug 29, 2013 at 17:58 history edited cassius CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification
Aug 22, 2013 at 11:34 comment added cassius Userr58220 - That actually wan't the question. I'm not talking about turning off anything. I'm talking about diluting the radioactive material to the point where it no longer poses the danger of generating hydrogen gas explosions. It seems to me that a large mass of metal would accomplish this before a breach in the outer containment vessel occurred. A similar process happened in the meltdown of the Chernobyl reactor, though it melted through the concrete and rock until it was diluted enough to solidify.
Aug 15, 2013 at 0:39 comment added DJohnM Further to RedGrittyBrick, the residual heat includes the decay energy of the short-lived fission products, which typically amount to 5% of full power. IOW, YOU CAN'T TURN IT OFF!!
Aug 14, 2013 at 23:59 comment added cassius 1) I'm not talking specifically about fukushima. If the process worked, it could be designed into future reactors or retrofitted in current ones. 2) It seems to me this would work much better for mitigating residual heat than simply pumping in more water.
Aug 14, 2013 at 23:43 comment added RedGrittyBrick The obvious difficulties are 1) Fukushima style reactors don't have any obvious mechanism for introducing iron into the reactor. 2) The problem at Fukushima was not stopping the nuclear fission of the fuel but in removing residual heat in the absence of power for the cooling systems.
Aug 14, 2013 at 23:41 review First posts
Aug 15, 2013 at 0:19
Aug 14, 2013 at 23:25 history asked cassius CC BY-SA 3.0