Timeline for How to verify that an operator is a tensor operator?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2022 at 15:19 | comment | added | ZeroTheHero | @Po1ynomia The CG method can be tedious but only because you are starting in a basis which is not spherical. Otherwise it is probably the most efficient way to construct complicated tensors without having to check the commutation relations all over again. I highly recommend you have a look at Baym as composite tensors are extremely useful in general. | |
| Dec 20, 2022 at 12:33 | comment | added | Po1ynomial | By the way, I have heard that the CGs are for coupling angular momentums, but here's only the orbital one. So is it really necessary to introduce that? (I am not really familiar with the topic) | |
| Dec 20, 2022 at 12:30 | comment | added | Po1ynomial | The CG method seems to be quite tedious. As for a specific operator, why should I adopt it instead of just working out the commutators? | |
| Dec 19, 2022 at 16:36 | history | edited | ZeroTheHero | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 702 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2022 at 16:21 | history | answered | ZeroTheHero | CC BY-SA 4.0 |