Skip to main content
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile. (See also: this questionthis question.)

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile. (See also: this question.)

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile. (See also: this question.)

added 118 characters in body
Source Link
Johannes
  • 19.3k
  • 2
  • 49
  • 80

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile. (See also: this question.)

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile.

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile. (See also: this question.)

added 141 characters in body
Source Link
Johannes
  • 19.3k
  • 2
  • 49
  • 80

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe". Although

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile.

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe". Although once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile.

The expansion model implied by this question is known as the "coasting universe".

Triggered mostly by the observed coincidence that the gravitational radius $R_0$ of the universe at current time $t_0$ equals $c t_0$, once in a while research papers appear that try to fit cosmological observations to this model. However, the observed acceleration of the cosmological expansion renders such exercises futile.

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Johannes
  • 19.3k
  • 2
  • 49
  • 80
Loading
Source Link
Johannes
  • 19.3k
  • 2
  • 49
  • 80
Loading