Timeline for Does a radio receiver "collapse" a radio wave function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 30, 2022 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1597923420527886338 | ||
Nov 22, 2022 at 21:48 | comment | added | Yakk | You appear to be wondering why your interpretation of QM results in what appears to be detectors acting a bit as if faster-than-light information is needed to coordinate what they see? Yes, that is what "De Broglie-Bohm is a non-local theory" means. Non-local theories suck. | |
Nov 21, 2022 at 22:07 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
There isn't any need to declare a question. Added some context. Removed meta information (this belongs in comments).
|
Nov 21, 2022 at 9:49 | answer | added | Roger V. | timeline score: 9 | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 23:09 | history | became hot network question | |||
Nov 20, 2022 at 22:12 | vote | accept | kdtop | ||
Nov 20, 2022 at 21:56 | comment | added | kdtop | @RogerVadim. Thank you for your reply. The post of Quantum description of radio antenna seems to be about a quantum understanding of the GENERATION of a radio wave, not the quantum behavior of that wave as it spreads out across the universe. | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 21:54 | comment | added | kdtop | @JeanBaptisteRoux I am aware of QFT but have not studied it in detail. My gross understanding is that everything (matter or energy) is considered to be oscillations of various quantum fields. I am thinking about photons / radio waves as fluctuations of the EM field. Are these different concepts? | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 20:41 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 24, 2022 at 3:10 | |||||
Nov 20, 2022 at 20:25 | comment | added | Roger V. | Does this answer your question? Quantum description of radio antenna | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 19:37 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 89 characters in body; edited tags
|
Nov 20, 2022 at 17:58 | answer | added | Jagerber48 | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 17:37 | answer | added | PhysicsDave | timeline score: 6 | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 15:25 | answer | added | ACuriousMind♦ | timeline score: 22 | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 15:18 | comment | added | John Doty | Radio is extremely accurately modeled as classical electromagnetic radiation. No quantum effects need to be considered. | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 15:16 | comment | added | John Doty | @JeanbaptisteRoux Quantum field theory, as applied to radio, isn't even wrong. | |
Nov 20, 2022 at 15:11 | comment | added | Jeanbaptiste Roux | Welcome to PSE! This is a great question and I think it comes from the limits of regular quantum mechanics, where the realm of quantum field theory is needed to have a better intuition/understanding of what is likely to happen. | |
S Nov 20, 2022 at 15:04 | review | First questions | |||
Nov 20, 2022 at 16:10 | |||||
S Nov 20, 2022 at 15:04 | history | asked | kdtop | CC BY-SA 4.0 |