Timeline for Does Born's rule guarantee component-wise probabilities? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2022 at 17:43 | comment | added | Galen | @GiorgioP re: density vs probability: Yup, good catch. Just wasn't paying enough attention to detail. | |
| Jul 24, 2022 at 17:42 | history | edited | Galen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed probability to probability density.
|
| Jul 24, 2022 at 12:01 | history | closed |
GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 John Rennie ZeroTheHero |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Jul 24, 2022 at 5:48 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 24, 2022 at 12:01 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2022 at 5:31 | comment | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | Moreover, the wavefunction may have more than one component, but their meaning is not of components on a basis in the three-dimensional physical space. | |
| Jul 24, 2022 at 5:28 | comment | added | GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90 | $|\psi|^2$ is a probability density, not a probability. It is not a minor difference: i) it makes $\psi$ a dimensional quantity, and ii) it allows values $|\psi|^2>1$. | |
| Jul 24, 2022 at 5:11 | answer | added | David | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 24, 2022 at 4:43 | history | edited | Níckolas Alves | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jul 24, 2022 at 4:25 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 24, 2022 at 3:59 | history | asked | Galen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |