Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
SRS
  • 27.2k
  • 12
  • 106
  • 341

Does the following non-separable wavefunction represent an entangled state?

$\psi(x1,x2)$$\psi(x_1,x_2)$ = $\exp[i b x_{1}x_{2}]\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$

This state can not be factorized into functions of $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$, but one might argue that an overall phase factor is physically irrelevant and only consider $\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$, is it valid to ignore the phase factor in this case?

Does the following non-separable wavefunction represent an entangled state?

$\psi(x1,x2)$ = $\exp[i b x_{1}x_{2}]\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$

This state can not be factorized into functions of $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$, but one might argue that an overall phase factor is physically irrelevant and only consider $\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$, is it valid to ignore the phase factor in this case?

Does the following non-separable wavefunction represent an entangled state?

$\psi(x_1,x_2)$ = $\exp[i b x_{1}x_{2}]\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$

This state can not be factorized into functions of $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$, but one might argue that an overall phase factor is physically irrelevant and only consider $\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$, is it valid to ignore the phase factor in this case?

Source Link
Paranoid
  • 427
  • 2
  • 12

Can a phase factor entangle two states?

Does the following non-separable wavefunction represent an entangled state?

$\psi(x1,x2)$ = $\exp[i b x_{1}x_{2}]\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$

This state can not be factorized into functions of $x_{1}$ and $x_{2}$, but one might argue that an overall phase factor is physically irrelevant and only consider $\phi(x_{1})\phi(x_{2})$, is it valid to ignore the phase factor in this case?