Timeline for Matrix elements $\langle n,k|x|n',k'\rangle$ for Bloch states
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2022 at 10:33 | vote | accept | dsfkgjn | ||
| S Jun 7, 2022 at 10:05 | history | bounty ended | dsfkgjn | ||
| S Jun 7, 2022 at 10:05 | history | notice removed | dsfkgjn | ||
| Jun 6, 2022 at 10:53 | answer | added | schris38 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 6, 2022 at 3:11 | comment | added | Daniel Leykam | From the paper, the authors take a finite lattice where N is the number of unit cells. You might find it easier to reproduce the derivation if you avoid the abuse of notation by writing $|n,k⟩= \int dx e^{ikx} u_{n,k}(x) |x> and work entirely in the position basis. I'll post the complete derivation later when I have time. | |
| Jun 4, 2022 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1533055990974775296 | ||
| S Jun 4, 2022 at 7:57 | history | bounty started | dsfkgjn | ||
| S Jun 4, 2022 at 7:57 | history | notice added | dsfkgjn | Draw attention | |
| May 30, 2022 at 7:04 | comment | added | dsfkgjn | Yes, the citing paper just states the result without proof | |
| May 30, 2022 at 6:50 | comment | added | Tobias Fünke | Have you tried to find the paper they're citing? Anyway, this notation is really weird, indeed. Perhaps it might be worth to ask this question on Matter Modeling. But please make sure to state that the question is cross posted. | |
| May 30, 2022 at 6:01 | history | asked | dsfkgjn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |