Skip to main content
added 211 characters in body
Source Link

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered ana MOS capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the threshold would increase.

Edit, answer to the MOSCAP edit: in the case of a MOS capacitor, since we have no n+ doped regions, I think the negative bulk potential helps the gate accumulate electrons, reducing the threshold Voltage.

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered an MOS capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the threshold would increase.

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered a MOS capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the threshold would increase.

Edit, answer to the MOSCAP edit: in the case of a MOS capacitor, since we have no n+ doped regions, I think the negative bulk potential helps the gate accumulate electrons, reducing the threshold Voltage.

deleted 1 character in body
Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.8k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.8k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered an mosMOS capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the tthresholdthreshold would increase.

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered an mos capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the tthreshold would increase.

I’m struggling to understand why a negative voltage applied to the bulk contact of an n-type MOSFET increases the threshold voltage. I can see why it happens due to the equations, but I can’t wrap my head around how it actually works.

I have 2 questions:

  1. Applying a negative voltage to the bulk makes the potential difference (and thus the field?) between the gate and the bulk greater, which should make it easier to attract electrons under the gate. Why is this wrong?

  2. Intuitively, the negative voltage at the bulk terminal repels electrons, pushing them towards the gate. Doesn’t this mean that the electron concentration under the gate increases more rapidly, reducing the threshold voltage?

Edit after John's answer:

Thank you, I think I get it now, but what would happen if we instead considered an MOS capacitor, so with no n+ doped regions? There I can't see how the threshold would increase.

added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 210 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Improved overall question, deleted unnecessary statements
Source Link
Loading
edited title
Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading