Timeline for What is the equation for the mass of an evaporating black hole over time?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Lawton | ||
S Apr 25, 2022 at 14:50 | history | edited | Jacopo Tissino | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added the complete equation, removed an extra parenthesis.
|
S Apr 25, 2022 at 14:50 | history | suggested | Lawton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added the complete equation, removed an extra parenthesis.
|
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:42 | comment | added | Lawton | That's it! I made a small edit to the answer to include the complete equation. Once the edit is approved I'll accept this as the correct answer. Thank you for your help! | |
Apr 25, 2022 at 14:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 25, 2022 at 14:50 | |||||
Apr 25, 2022 at 13:44 | comment | added | Jacopo Tissino | Right! I hadn't properly parsed that part of the question. Addressed it now. | |
Apr 25, 2022 at 13:43 | history | edited | Jacopo Tissino | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added mass as a function of time
|
Apr 25, 2022 at 12:53 | comment | added | Lawton | I'm still not sure how this helps, so I may be missing something obvious. You've shown how to arrive at the equation for the total time for evaporation as a function of mass, which is the first equation I give in my question, when starting from the equation for the power output as a function of mass, which is the second equation I give in my question. How do I go from these two known equations to an equation for mass as a function of time? | |
Apr 25, 2022 at 9:58 | comment | added | Jacopo Tissino | @Lawton as for the first point, it's just a common notational convenience to group a bunch of constants into one to avoid having to write them out several times. | |
Apr 25, 2022 at 9:56 | history | edited | Jacopo Tissino | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added working out of separable ODE
|
Apr 25, 2022 at 9:51 | comment | added | Jacopo Tissino | @Lawton as for the second point, yes you do need a function of $t$, but a constant function is indeed a (very simple) function of $t$ or of any other variable you like! I'll include some more details. | |
Apr 24, 2022 at 22:42 | comment | added | Lawton | I've looked into separable ordinary differential equations, and it seems like I would need to have a function in terms of $t$ in order for this to count. Is that correct? Both equations I have are in terms of $M$, which doesn't seem to fit the criteria. | |
Apr 24, 2022 at 22:19 | comment | added | Lawton | What do you mean by "a constant $k$ which encapsulates all the ones you have written"? | |
Apr 24, 2022 at 18:28 | history | answered | Jacopo Tissino | CC BY-SA 4.0 |