Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2022 at 21:40 vote accept Boliotis Manousos
Apr 13, 2022 at 17:31 comment added Boliotis Manousos True, I figured that myself later when I was thinking that if energy is proporcional to 1/(distance)^2 then distance must go to infinity so that 1/(distance)^2 go to zero.
Apr 13, 2022 at 15:11 comment added TooTea @BoliotisManousos There's no X_max. The inverse square relationship asymptotically approaches zero as distance tends to infinity, it never becomes exactly zero. Of course you might not have instruments sensitive enough to detect light weaker than some threshold, but that's just a technical detail, no law of physics.
Apr 13, 2022 at 12:33 comment added Boliotis Manousos for example the background cosmic radiation haven't reach that X_max (i guess) because we can still detect it.
Apr 13, 2022 at 11:42 comment added jensen paull That depends on the sensitivity of your instruments. Or perhaps some quantum weirdness, which I am not able to comment on
Apr 13, 2022 at 11:41 history edited jensen paull CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3 characters in body
Apr 13, 2022 at 9:47 vote accept Boliotis Manousos
Apr 13, 2022 at 13:23
Apr 13, 2022 at 9:45 comment added Boliotis Manousos I understand your explaination. So no energy is "lost"(converted to some other form) but in contrary it's spread over a wider area so if you are far away from the source the energy you can detect seems reduced. I guess that after a distance: X_max, you can't detect energy at all. So is there a way to calculate this X_max?
Apr 12, 2022 at 23:21 history edited jensen paull CC BY-SA 4.0
added 131 characters in body
Apr 12, 2022 at 23:16 history answered jensen paull CC BY-SA 4.0