Timeline for Are canonical commutation relations only valid for non-relativistic QM? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2022 at 14:55 | history | closed | Qmechanic♦ | Needs more focus | |
| Mar 27, 2022 at 14:55 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | To reopen this post (v1), consider to only ask about RQM (as opposed to QFT). | |
| Mar 23, 2022 at 13:34 | comment | added | Tobias Fünke | Possibly related (i,e. discussing the position operator in QFT): This and this | |
| Mar 23, 2022 at 13:19 | comment | added | Alex Gower | Ah okay, so position being a variable like time in QFT agrees with this only being motivated for non-relativistic QM then? I think that makes sense | |
| Mar 23, 2022 at 13:15 | history | asked | Alex Gower | CC BY-SA 4.0 |