Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 14, 2022 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1503249589914288133
Mar 13, 2022 at 20:18 history removed from network questions Qmechanic
Mar 13, 2022 at 17:21 answer added nanoman timeline score: 6
Mar 13, 2022 at 16:58 history became hot network question
Mar 13, 2022 at 13:58 comment added Andrew As far as anyone knows, all physical phenomena on "ordinary" length scales (really, from the size of a proton to the size of the observable Universe) can be explained in terms of the Standard Model plus general relativity, at least in principle. There are many cases where this link is not known explicitly (the vast majority of cases are like that in fact). But there are no cases where someone has observed a phenomenon that provably cannot be reduced to complicated interactions between fundamental particles. However, reducing things down to the Standard Model is rarely necessary or useful.
Mar 13, 2022 at 10:51 comment added anna v "Strong emergence is the notion of emergence that is most common in philosophical discussions of emergence, and is the notion invoked by the British emergentists of the 1920s." consc.net/papers/emergence.pdf . Then this discussion is not on topic for the site, it is a philosophical question. certainly not a physics topic. I expect biological systems which emerge from the underlying atomic substructure would be strongly emergent .
Mar 13, 2022 at 9:39 comment added Arman Armenpress @anna v No, this is a weak emergence.
Mar 13, 2022 at 9:24 comment added anna v Thermodynamics emerges from statistical mechanics, its variables can be mathematically stated by averages in statistical mechanics, but are a completely new set. Would you call it strongly emergent?
Mar 13, 2022 at 9:16 answer added Andrew Steane timeline score: 4
Mar 13, 2022 at 8:56 history asked Arman Armenpress CC BY-SA 4.0