Skip to main content
changed formulation, fixed conclusion
Source Link
David
  • 2.7k
  • 16
  • 20

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx -\omega t)+\cos(-kx - \omega t)] $$

In a scalar formulation, it's convenient to define the positive and negative direction of propogation through the negative $\omega t$. Since we'll be working in a vector formulation with $k$, it's easier to show the direction through the sign on $k$. There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$$$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} - \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x-\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$$$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x-\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$$$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x-\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal magnitude, but opposite direction. UltimatelyThis suggests that two plane waves with common phase, the waves must be propagating in opposite direction with the same wavenumber to form a standing wave just like inthat have the one-dimensional casesame amplitude of wavenumber, will in fact make a standing wave when viewed within a particular plane.

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$

There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal. Ultimately, the waves must be propagating in opposite direction with the same wavenumber to form a standing wave just like in the one-dimensional case.

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx -\omega t)+\cos(-kx - \omega t)] $$

In a scalar formulation, it's convenient to define the positive and negative direction of propogation through the negative $\omega t$. Since we'll be working in a vector formulation with $k$, it's easier to show the direction through the sign on $k$. There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} - \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x-\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x-\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x-\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are equal magnitude, but opposite direction. This suggests that two plane waves with common phase, that have the same amplitude of wavenumber, will in fact make a standing wave when viewed within a particular plane.

made conclusion clearer
Source Link
David
  • 2.7k
  • 16
  • 20

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$

There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal. Ultimately, the wavenumbers must be equal to get any kind of standing wave, notthe waves must be propagating in opposite direction with the same wavenumber to form a standing wave just individual componentslike in the one-dimensional case.

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$

There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal. Ultimately, the wavenumbers must be equal to get any kind of standing wave, not just individual components.

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$

There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal. Ultimately, the waves must be propagating in opposite direction with the same wavenumber to form a standing wave just like in the one-dimensional case.

Source Link
David
  • 2.7k
  • 16
  • 20

The question is unclear, but I believe can be summarized as "can standing waves form from plane waves that propagate at some arbitrary angle to each other?"

A standing wave is most easily understood in one dimension, and can be described by the equation. $$ u = A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t) $$

It's a simple product-sum trig identity, which can be found on this page that relates the standing wave to the waves propagating in opposite directions.

$$ 2A\cos(k x)\cos(\omega t)= A[\cos(kx-\omega t)+cos(kx+\omega t)] $$

There could also be an arbitrary phase.

Now to show that something like a standing wave could occur in two dimensions (easily generalized to 3 dimensions), it's easier to use complex exponentials to represent the waves. Adding the two waves (q is the wavenumber of the second wave): $$ Ae^{i(\mathbf{k \cdot r}-\omega t)} + Ae^{i(\mathbf{q \cdot r} + \omega t)} = Ae^{ik_{y}y}e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+Ae^{iq_{y}y}e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)} $$ If the y component of the wavenumber is identical for both waves, then the y component can be combined with the amplitude to form a complex amplitude common between both waves, with a phase that depends on y. $$ Ae^{ik_{y}y}(e^{i(k_{x}x-\omega t)}+e^{i(q_{x}x+\omega t)}) $$ Reverting back to a trig representation, and ignoring the y dependent phase: $$ A[\cos(k_{x}x-\omega t)+cos(q_{x}x+\omega t)] $$ You should be able to recognize that this is a standing wave if the x components of the wavenumber are also equal. Ultimately, the wavenumbers must be equal to get any kind of standing wave, not just individual components.