Timeline for Cross Product of two Hermitian Operators
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:56 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:44 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:38 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:29 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | Thanks. I did. The point of nondimensionalization is to avoid sidetracking to dimensional analysis distractions, not to invite them, so, ipso facto I failed in that. Problem redressed now! | |
Jul 28, 2022 at 14:27 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 103 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2022 at 11:42 | comment | added | J.G. | My recommendation is to the put the $mk$ factor on $\hat{r}$, and carry over that convention in your formula for $A^2$, and link to an explanation of LRL. | |
Jul 28, 2022 at 7:58 | comment | added | J.G. | Since $\hat{r}$ is dimensionless, your "etc." must also nondimensionalize velocity, which is strange in a nonrelativistic theory. (Or maybe you meant $\vec{r}$, in which case you'd need a condition of the form $\omega=1$.) | |
Jul 28, 2022 at 5:22 | comment | added | J.G. | Even if we nondimensionalize $L$, the unexplained addition of $\hat{r}$ is dimensionally inconsistent. | |
Mar 4, 2022 at 15:25 | history | edited | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 214 characters in body
|
Mar 3, 2022 at 20:04 | history | answered | Cosmas Zachos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |