Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 24, 2022 at 5:30 comment added Alex Trounev @Euler_Salter I think it is more fantasy then reality about accuracy of velocity Verlet compare to regular Verlet. Also leapfrog and Verlet look same on a large system numerical solution. Nevertheless could you compare 3 algorithms on your problem and report here about accuracy compare to exact solution?
Feb 23, 2022 at 20:16 answer added Kyle Kanos timeline score: 1
Feb 23, 2022 at 17:43 comment added Euler_Salter @KyleKanos the more I look at velocity-Verlet and Leapfrog the less I see the difference between them. Aren't they the same? Basically I am looking for second order, explicit sympletic integrators (possibly time reversible) and looking at the differences between them
Feb 23, 2022 at 17:41 comment added Euler_Salter @AlexTrounev that's odd because on page 20 of this thesis bird.bcamath.org/handle/20.500.11824/789 they cite a few papers were apparently they show that the velocity-Verlet is numerically more accurate
Feb 23, 2022 at 17:41 comment added Euler_Salter @KyleKanos yes I did forget, just edited!
Feb 23, 2022 at 17:40 history edited Euler_Salter CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Feb 23, 2022 at 16:59 comment added Alex Trounev There is no difference in numerical solutions with leapfrog method and Verlet algorithm as it has been testified on a large system of 500-5000 equations discussed on mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/208590/…
Feb 23, 2022 at 16:53 comment added Kyle Kanos Also, it looks like you forgot to swap the p's and q's between the two methods you've written.
Feb 23, 2022 at 16:52 comment added Kyle Kanos The leapfrog you've written is velocity Verlet method as far as I can tell. My experience with leapfrog is quite different (cf this post of mine).
Feb 23, 2022 at 16:34 history asked Euler_Salter CC BY-SA 4.0