Timeline for Actual physicists: shoot down my hypothesis regarding antimatter, primordial black holes, and the origin of the universe [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2021 at 19:17 | comment | added | user323379 | Ha ha, I expected to be taught a thing or two, but the trolling here is impressive. Who knew physicists could have such a mean streak? Happy holidays and all the best you. Thank you for taking the time to respond. | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 17:28 | comment | added | Gilbert | You are quite imaginative! Perhaps you can turn that creativity toward science fiction? If you do, I recommend checking out the Worldbuilding stack exchange. They would love to hear about the “fabric” of spacetime taken literally. There could be beings which weave it! | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 9:16 | comment | added | Triatticus | It's also not really up to is to shoot down theories, it's up to you to provide calculable predictions from your "model" that match experimental/observed phenomena. | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 9:09 | comment | added | anna v | The Big Bang cosmological model is successful in fitting most observations we have of the universe, except specific ones, as is baryon asymmetry . A new model would have to "embed" the Big Bang model, in addition to offering a better mathematical model to explain the puzzles. The type of model you envisage would introduce a lot of effects that are not observed and could not embed the Big Bang validated data. see comment of @TheTiler | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 9:02 | comment | added | The Tiler | If it was the case, we will have areas in the universe that emit large amounts of radiation (gamma, x, ... consequence of the annihilation matter antimatter) and if I remember well, there is already this theory in the theory of branes . | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 9:00 | comment | added | Koschi | To my knowledge there is no assumed difference between matter and antimatter after it fell into a black hole, i.e. there could be no annihilation between "matter BH" and "antimatter BH" that results in an "explosion". | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 8:59 | comment | added | user323379 | I'm afraid you're probably right. I really didn't want to post it as a blog though, as it really is more of a question. | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 8:58 | history | closed |
ProfRob John Rennie Qmechanic♦ |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 8:56 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 20, 2021 at 8:55 | comment | added | Marius Ladegård Meyer | Hi Jason. As much as the content in this post might be interesting, it seems to belong on a blog...? Physics Stackexchange is a question&answer site about concepts in mainstream physics... Unfortunately I believe your question will be closed as it 1) is not focused enough, as you get into many different effects and phenomena, 2) is about a personal hypothesis/theory and not mainstream physics, and 3) contains a large number of questions, so formulating a concise answer will be very challenging for anyone trying to answer. | |
| S Dec 20, 2021 at 8:49 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 20, 2021 at 9:07 | |||||
| S Dec 20, 2021 at 8:49 | history | asked | user323379 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |