Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 24, 2013 at 20:09 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/349257967826255874
Jun 12, 2013 at 23:17 comment added Chay Paterson OK: the full D+1 dimensional spacetime doesn't have a vacuum energy.
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:55 comment added Dilaton @ChayPaterson this is about the full D+1 dimensional spacetime, even though the metric can be partitioned into the expanding and contracting dimensions, they are not "warped" or something (if I rememeber correctly what "wharped" means).
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:52 answer added user4552 timeline score: 3
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:45 comment added Chay Paterson Oh, ok. Well, my thinking was that the cosmological constant has a different meaning depending on if you are looking at just the 3+1 dimensional slice of the spacetime or the full D+1 dimensional spacetime: on the 3+1 dimensional slice, it might still be interpretable as the potential energy of a scalar field, but I think that will depend on whether or not you can separate out the dynamics of the compact dimensions. (Disclaimer: I'm not an expert)
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:32 comment added Dilaton @ChayPaterson about that there is unfortunately no information, I rather thought they should be compact ?
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:28 comment added Chay Paterson Sure. Do we know if the contracting dimensions are compact or noncompact?
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:28 history edited Dilaton CC BY-SA 3.0
added 15 characters in body
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:26 comment added Dilaton @ChayPaterson there are for example 3 expanding spatial dimensions and $n>1$ contracting dimensions.
Jun 12, 2013 at 21:22 comment added Chay Paterson Which dimensions have negative $p_j$? Knowing a little bit about the global topology might help with the vacuum energy question.
Jun 12, 2013 at 20:59 history asked Dilaton CC BY-SA 3.0