Timeline for Why do we ignore the second-order terms in the following expansion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Nov 12, 2021 at 21:18 | history | suggested | Tyberius | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
converted image to text/equations
|
| Nov 12, 2021 at 20:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 12, 2021 at 21:18 | |||||
| Nov 12, 2021 at 9:24 | comment | added | jng224 | Hello! It is preferable to type out screenshots or images of text; for formulae, one can use MathJax. Thanks! | |
| Nov 12, 2021 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1459083548330180609 | ||
| Nov 12, 2021 at 3:15 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Nov 11, 2021 at 18:49 | answer | added | Michael Seifert | timeline score: 13 | |
| Nov 11, 2021 at 18:01 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 11, 2021 at 17:36 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
|
| Nov 11, 2021 at 17:32 | answer | added | Eli | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 11, 2021 at 17:21 | answer | added | Andrew | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 11, 2021 at 16:59 | history | asked | Deepanshu Chaudhary | CC BY-SA 4.0 |