Timeline for Why do the bubbles in a champagne accelerate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2021 at 14:17 | comment | added | foolishmuse | @AgniusVasiliauskas This is far outside the scope of this OP. Look at my answer to this question to see a link to the paper. physics.stackexchange.com/questions/669093/… Then feel free to contact me directly. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 21:03 | comment | added | Agnius Vasiliauskas | Gluons binds quarks in a nucleons- such as proton and neutron, so gluons has relation with strong nuclear interaction, but has nothing to do with gravity at all. Do not mess-up different kinds of forces. Besides if you would be introduced to gravitational lensing, you would know that photon trajectory can be bended by massive stars gravitation. So something transmits gravity to photon too in quantum mechanical terms. However photon has nothing to do with gluons at all, because it's just quanta of electromagnetic wave. Lastly do not invent bicycle, better check info about graviton. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 14:45 | comment | added | foolishmuse | @AgniusVasiliauskas this is not the place for an extended discussion so I won't pursue it any further. And yes, I do have a "full scale quantum gravity theory" based on gluon field excitation. And I'm working to get it published. Let me know if you'd like to help. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 10:34 | comment | added | Agnius Vasiliauskas | As about your "gravity explanation" - it's already explained by Newton and Einstein. Unless you have full scale quantum gravity theory in your mind. If you do - you can publish it in any scientific journal, you are welcome. | |
| Oct 9, 2021 at 10:25 | comment | added | Agnius Vasiliauskas | Seems you don't understood my critics. I'm citing you "As the bubble gets higher, the pressure continues to decrease and this allows for the acceleration". Wrong. Acceleration is NOT caused by decreasing pressure with decreasing depth of bubble. Acceleration is given by buoyancy, which in turn is due to pressure difference between low and high immersed object parts. Acceleration due to buoyancy is indifferent to decreasing pressure with decreasing height, in contrary what you have said. | |
| Oct 8, 2021 at 22:53 | comment | added | foolishmuse | @AgniusVasiliauskas Yes, pressure decreases above and below, but the pressure above will always be less than that below, so the bubble is essentially chasing itself upwards. Regarding "antigravity", I was using that as a simple example. I'm trying to explain gravity as a pressure system, because I've learned that it acts exactly in that way. So far nobody has supplied a better explanation. | |
| Oct 8, 2021 at 22:47 | comment | added | foolishmuse | That pressure difference above and below the bubble is everything. If you look at a bubble in water in space, you see that it doesn't rise, but remains in the middle of the water. usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/… | |
| Oct 8, 2021 at 20:35 | comment | added | Agnius Vasiliauskas | Pressure decreases above AND below the bubble, so overall buoyancy effect does not depend on exact depth, but rather on pressure difference between above and below object, which stays $\text {const}$ as object rises. Both rock and cork experiences gravity and buoyancy, simply net force will be different for them. In physics no such thing as "antigravity", unless you have a negative mass. Lastly sorry, but personal theories are not supported in this forum. | |
| Oct 8, 2021 at 15:34 | history | answered | foolishmuse | CC BY-SA 4.0 |