Timeline for Relativistic factor between coordinate acceleration and proper acceleration
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
S Jun 12, 2014 at 8:14 | history | edited | Bernhard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
shift, ".", ","
|
S Jun 12, 2014 at 8:14 | history | suggested | peterh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
shift, ".", ","
|
Jun 12, 2014 at 8:10 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 12, 2014 at 8:14 | |||||
Jun 3, 2013 at 2:54 | answer | added | John McAndrew | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 22:19 | comment | added | diffeomorphism | Larry, there is only an inertial frame (x,t), the proper frame is implicit, non-inertial, and assumed to coincide with (x,t) at x=0, t=0 | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 20:04 | answer | added | Pulsar | timeline score: 16 | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 19:06 | answer | added | Alfred Centauri | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 18:58 | comment | added | Larry Harson | You have $t$ and $\tau$ to define time in the lab and proper frames, an $x$ for the space coordinates of one frame, so where's your space variable for the other frame? | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 18:52 | comment | added | diffeomorphism | not sure i follow, you mean the velocity? that is $\frac{dx}{dt}$ | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 18:11 | comment | added | Larry Harson | Where's the $x'$ term? | |
Jun 2, 2013 at 17:54 | history | asked | diffeomorphism | CC BY-SA 3.0 |