Timeline for Focusing lens placed after double slit experiment
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7 at 23:43 | history | edited | Vincent Thacker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Aug 28, 2021 at 18:05 | comment | added | R.W. Bird | If the screen is not at the focal point of the lens, the image will go out of focus. | |
| Aug 28, 2021 at 17:56 | comment | added | mp12853 | If I leave the screen where it is, will the interference pattern just get more spread out then? | |
| Aug 28, 2021 at 17:50 | comment | added | R.W. Bird | Using a lens after the slits lets you bring the screen closer. Using a lens before the slits lets you bring a line source closer. | |
| Aug 28, 2021 at 15:07 | comment | added | mp12853 | I am not sure I understand what you mean. The formula I included is for the general intensity distribution produced by a double slit experiment (which includes the assumption that the distance to the screen is large relative to the slit width). (I have edited the question to try and make this more clear) | |
| Aug 28, 2021 at 13:56 | history | answered | R.W. Bird | CC BY-SA 4.0 |