Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 29, 2013 at 20:14 comment added Man Whoever downvoted this answer, can you please comment?
May 29, 2013 at 20:13 history edited Man CC BY-SA 3.0
added 257 characters in body
May 28, 2013 at 16:35 comment added Izzhov Yeah, I've taken a seminar on special relativity, though we didn't get quite as advanced as learning Thomas Precession. I was trying to teach myself this more advanced material using Jackson's book when I came up with this problem.
May 28, 2013 at 15:54 comment added Man Have you had a course on relativity? Because that's what is messing up things.
May 28, 2013 at 15:53 comment added Man (1) Yes, so that's settled. (2) I agree, it still doesn't give the answer. I am trying.
May 28, 2013 at 14:45 comment added Izzhov For (1), does that mean that, in fact, $\mathbf{a} \neq \frac{d\mathbf{v}}{dt}$, but rather $\mathbf{a} = \gamma\frac{d\mathbf{v}}{dt}$? If so, point taken. However, I believe I've already accounted for (2), as the left hand side is in the lab frame, meaning you don't need to refer to proper time, and the derivative on the right hand side is zero, so multiplying it by a constant won't change it. Furthermore, all this only adds factors of $\gamma$, but the solution is off by a factor of $1 - \gamma$.
May 28, 2013 at 12:46 history edited Man CC BY-SA 3.0
added 130 characters in body
May 28, 2013 at 12:13 history edited Man CC BY-SA 3.0
added 26 characters in body
May 27, 2013 at 23:49 comment added Man This is still not giving the correct answer, something else is wrong too.
May 27, 2013 at 23:47 history edited Man CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 11 characters in body
May 27, 2013 at 23:38 history edited Man CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 10 characters in body
May 27, 2013 at 23:27 history answered Man CC BY-SA 3.0