Timeline for Is anti-unitary quantum mechanics possible?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 11:51 | vote | accept | Mauricio | ||
| Aug 18, 2021 at 11:18 | answer | added | user87745 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 11:02 | comment | added | Mauricio | @ValterMoretti Is more of a definition, the problem is that $A$ is not your usual matrix because it is antilinear. | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 11:02 | history | edited | Mauricio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
flip equation
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 11:00 | comment | added | Valter Moretti | I agree with the other comments: it is not possible to use only anti unitary operators. However, this identity $A|\psi \rangle = |A\psi \rangle$ is obscure, I cannot interpret it. | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:39 | comment | added | jacob1729 | You can't make the time evolution operator $U(t)$ anti-unitary for all $t$ since $U(0)$ needs to be the identity. | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:34 | history | edited | Mauricio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 68 characters in body
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:33 | comment | added | Mauricio | @AccidentalFourierTransform Good point. | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:29 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:29 | comment | added | AccidentalFourierTransform | There is no theory with only anti-unitaries. The product of two anti-unitaries is always unitary. | |
| S Aug 18, 2021 at 10:26 | history | suggested | Jakeup | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 18, 2021 at 10:26 | |||||
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:22 | history | edited | Mauricio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 10:10 | history | asked | Mauricio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |