Timeline for Origin of Ladder Operator methods
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Mar 27, 2023 at 11:51 | history | suggested | Johny Dow | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
replace dead link by archived version
|
Mar 27, 2023 at 7:16 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 27, 2023 at 11:51 | |||||
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:32 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | (2) How do even know anything about how non-Cartan generators act on weight vectors? By your construction, it seems like the weight vectors have nothing to do with the non-Cartan generators. It seems totally random that you not only assume non-Cartan generators come in pairs, but that those pairs are necessarily Hermitian conjugates of each other. | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:27 | comment | added | Arturo don Juan | @jinawee A few questions upon reading your answer: (1) You say that the action of a non-Cartan generator on a weight vector will simply produce an eigenvalue $\pm e^i_j + t^i_k$. How can you even say "eigenvalue" for a non-Cartan generator? If a non-Cartan generator acts on a weight vector, which by definition is an eigenvector of one of the Cartan generators, couldn't it in general produce a complicated linear combination of weight-vectors? | |
Jun 5, 2013 at 17:55 | comment | added | jinawee | @Urukec The book is this. It explains weight representations and almost every type of algebra in Particle Physics (SU(n), SO(n), E6, etc). | |
Jun 4, 2013 at 17:43 | comment | added | Ziqian Xie | Can you give a link to the Georgi's book you refered? | |
May 25, 2013 at 19:02 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 18:22 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 618 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 12:43 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 600 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 11:51 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 82 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 11:38 | comment | added | jinawee | @Comp_Warrior No problem, I'll try to explain it better. | |
May 25, 2013 at 11:36 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 293 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 10:53 | comment | added | Comp_Warrior | Wow, this is pretty detailed, but I can't say I understand ; especially since I don't know about group theory orLie algebras! | |
May 24, 2013 at 23:45 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body; edited body
|
May 24, 2013 at 23:09 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 664 characters in body
|
May 24, 2013 at 21:07 | history | edited | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1091 characters in body
|
May 24, 2013 at 19:19 | history | answered | jinawee | CC BY-SA 3.0 |