Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 2, 2022 at 16:19 comment added Geoffrey Johnson How strongly correlated are Alice's choices of measurement orientations and Bob's actual measurements? Are these correlations microscopically small, detectable only with an incredibly large sample size, or are the correlations uncannily large, larger than one would expect for causally distant yet nevertheless connected events? If superdeterminism is a thing, shouldn't we be able to detect the same sort of correlations in causally distant non-quantum events. Have these correlations been detected in non-quantum experiments? If not, how would we explain this?
Sep 2, 2022 at 19:46 history edited Norbert Schuch
edited tags
Sep 2, 2022 at 17:28 answer added John J. Bannan timeline score: -3
Aug 2, 2022 at 14:43 history edited glS CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Aug 2, 2022 at 3:08 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jul 13, 2021 at 17:30 comment added alanf physics.stackexchange.com/questions/106725/…
Jul 13, 2021 at 15:57 comment added knzhou That is, superdeterminism is a much much much stronger assumption than mere determinism (though some disingenuous popularizers try to elide the difference), and stronger in a way that feels weird to almost all physicists.
Jul 13, 2021 at 15:57 comment added knzhou Superdeterminism is like saying the moon continuously and deterministically blinks out of existence, but the initial conditions of the universe have been set up so that this only happens exactly at the moments you're not looking at it.
Jul 13, 2021 at 15:52 answer added glS timeline score: 3
Jul 12, 2021 at 20:37 history edited Qmechanic
edited tags
Jul 12, 2021 at 20:36 history asked Trev CC BY-SA 4.0