Timeline for How can string theory work without supersymmetry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:39 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 25, 2013 at 20:55 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Jul 24, 2013 at 23:48 | comment | added | Dilaton | There is a possibly related paper about non supersymmetric F-Theory compactifications discussed in the first part of this blog post. | |
| May 17, 2013 at 15:03 | vote | accept | Dilaton | ||
| May 16, 2013 at 2:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/334852455877705729 | ||
| May 16, 2013 at 2:01 | comment | added | Mitchell Porter | Actually, the SO(16) x SO(16) string in that paper might already be an example of the type 0 string? Anyway, one thing to note is that some of these "nonsusy strings" still have a type of susy somewhere, e.g. on the worldsheet but not in spacetime. | |
| May 16, 2013 at 1:12 | answer | added | user1504 | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 16, 2013 at 1:11 | comment | added | Mitchell Porter | Along with the type 0 string, arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9707148 is another example. | |
| May 15, 2013 at 23:49 | comment | added | Dilaton | Thanks for the link @user1504, I like your question and Lumo's answer there :-) | |
| May 15, 2013 at 23:28 | comment | added | user1504 | related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/30703 | |
| May 15, 2013 at 23:12 | history | edited | Dilaton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Whoops ...
|
| May 15, 2013 at 23:06 | history | asked | Dilaton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |