Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 12, 2023 at 16:36 answer added Steven Thomas Hatton timeline score: 0
Jan 12, 2023 at 16:23 history edited Steven Thomas Hatton CC BY-SA 4.0
spelling
Jun 21, 2021 at 12:47 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 4.0
Res. recom. can usually not be mixed with an actual physics q
Jun 19, 2021 at 10:39 vote accept Steven Thomas Hatton
Jun 19, 2021 at 6:20 comment added Steven Thomas Hatton I'm fairly convinced that more is intended than simply introducing tangent spaces, etc. In many places in the book, they show a great deal of enthusiasm for what can be accomplished without a metric. In Chapter 9 the notion of a tangent vector arrow in a tangent space becomes useful fiction. What remains is the ability to differentiate scalar functions with respect to a parameter. The books by Loring Tu and Frank Warner appear to share MTW's view. But they are formidable challenges. C. H. Edwards mumbles conspicuously in this area. Alfred Grey introduces arc-length almost immediately.
Jun 19, 2021 at 5:35 comment added peek-a-boo it seems like this is just a heuristic idea to motivate the definition of a tangent vector (though I'm not a fan of such heuristics; I would much rather see the precise definition first and then look at the motivation). Also, I'm not really sure what your main concern is. Anyway, the concepts of differentiable manifolds, "curves" in a manifold (i.e just a smooth mapping of an interval into the manifold), and tangent space to a differentiable manifold are all standard topics, so once again, I'm not really sure what you're after.
Jun 19, 2021 at 5:26 history edited Steven Thomas Hatton CC BY-SA 4.0
added resource=recommendations tag
Jun 18, 2021 at 11:52 answer added Umaxo timeline score: 1
Jun 18, 2021 at 9:44 history edited Steven Thomas Hatton CC BY-SA 4.0
added a comment about embedding spaces
Jun 18, 2021 at 9:35 history asked Steven Thomas Hatton CC BY-SA 4.0