Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 7, 2013 at 21:48 comment added Kile Kasmir Asmussen @AlexA the 'indeterminism' part only crops up when you fail to see yourself as part of the system. You are made of quantum mechanical interactions too. When you 'measure' you interact with the system you want information out of. I cannot predict my sensory experiences of interacting with a 2^-0.5 * (|0> + |1>) system. But I know it is obeys several mathematical laws below the bonnet. The Born probabilities are an open problem, probably to be solved with Evidential Decision Theory and Physics together. Not by sweeping it under the rug of "Collapse."
May 10, 2013 at 23:27 history edited agemO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 609 characters in body
May 10, 2013 at 16:47 comment added Alex A Lastly, can you please elaborate the last part of your answer? I don't see how QM would be contradictory.
May 10, 2013 at 16:45 comment added Alex A I disagree, for various reasons. First, how can you say that QM is deterministic? Can you predict with certainty the result of, let's say, an energy measurement of a two-level system in the state $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\left|0\right> + \left|1\right>)$? Also, if you haven't heard of non deterministic theories in physics, I suggest you to check out spontaneous collapse models, where the indeterminism is explicit in a stochastic extra term on Schrödinger equation (I'm referring mainly to the GRW theory).
May 10, 2013 at 16:19 history edited agemO CC BY-SA 3.0
added 576 characters in body
May 10, 2013 at 16:10 history answered agemO CC BY-SA 3.0