Timeline for How should this argument (about the non-validity of Special Relativity) be interpreted? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2021 at 12:25 | history | edited | Deschele Schilder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2021 at 12:17 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 15, 2021 at 15:26 | |||||
| May 15, 2021 at 12:10 | history | edited | Deschele Schilder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 450 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2021 at 12:02 | comment | added | Deschele Schilder | @Jonas Ah, the same guy. I thought that what I cited above was written by W. Engelhardt. I found what was written above after further googling his name. Initially, I stumbled upon this (by Engelhardt): arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0511172.pdf Is this (though highly mathematical) written with a same attitude towards SR? | |
| May 15, 2021 at 11:54 | vote | accept | Deschele Schilder | ||
| May 15, 2021 at 11:53 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 15, 2021 at 11:51 | history | closed | ACuriousMind♦ | Not suitable for this site | |
| May 15, 2021 at 11:50 | answer | added | Eric Smith | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 15, 2021 at 11:42 | comment | added | jng224 | physics.stackexchange.com/q/80465 | |
| May 15, 2021 at 11:21 | history | asked | Deschele Schilder | CC BY-SA 4.0 |