Skip to main content
added 5 characters in body
Source Link
Oбжорoв
  • 3.2k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 26

Maybe, just maybe, we don't have a good word for it and we should call it a "warticle" or a "pave"? Why would you expect that a phenomenon at such a small scale can be described by words we use for the macroscopic world? Sometimes it behaves like how we know a wave behaves, sometimes isit behaves like wehow we know a particle behaves. There is nothing more to it. Learn to live with it!

Maybe, just maybe, we don't have a good word for it and we should call it a "warticle" or a "pave"? Why would you expect that a phenomenon at such a small scale can be described by words we use for the macroscopic world? Sometimes it behaves like how we know a wave behaves, sometimes is behaves like we know a particle behaves. There is nothing more to it. Learn to live with it!

Maybe, just maybe, we don't have a good word for it and we should call it a "warticle" or a "pave"? Why would you expect that a phenomenon at such a small scale can be described by words we use for the macroscopic world? Sometimes it behaves like how we know a wave behaves, sometimes it behaves like how we know a particle behaves. There is nothing more to it. Learn to live with it!

Source Link
Oбжорoв
  • 3.2k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 26

Maybe, just maybe, we don't have a good word for it and we should call it a "warticle" or a "pave"? Why would you expect that a phenomenon at such a small scale can be described by words we use for the macroscopic world? Sometimes it behaves like how we know a wave behaves, sometimes is behaves like we know a particle behaves. There is nothing more to it. Learn to live with it!