Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Res. req. can usually not be mixed with an actual physics question
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for any $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for any $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for any $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1389595735105187844
Notice added Draw attention by SolubleFish
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by SolubleFish
edited body
Source Link
SolubleFish
  • 6.1k
  • 7
  • 31

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for allany $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for all $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for any $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

added 163 characters in body
Source Link
SolubleFish
  • 6.1k
  • 7
  • 31

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for all $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

I came across this article, in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for all $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

I came across this article [1], in which the author studies some Hamiltonian that have a discrete spectrum even though they do not go to infinity at infinity.

In there, the author makes several claims, that I don't really get :

If $H_1 \geqslant H_2$ and $H_2$ has a discrete spectrum, then so does $H_1$.

If $\operatorname{Tr}e^{-tH}< \infty$ for all $t$, then $H$ has a discrete spectrum.

I would like to understand the intuition behind those results, as well as their formal proofs. Maybe some references on the spectrum of operator on Hilbert spaces could be useful as well.

[1] Some quantum operators with discrete spectrum but classically continuous spectrum; B. Simon (Caltech); Published in: Annals Phys. 146 (1983), 209-220

Source Link
SolubleFish
  • 6.1k
  • 7
  • 31
Loading