Timeline for Disadvantages of dimensional regularization as a regularization method
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2021 at 23:05 | review | Low quality answers | |||
| Apr 22, 2021 at 2:21 | |||||
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:56 | comment | added | Bastam Tajik | I see your point. But at the time I wrote the question I could only see mathematical naive objections to the method that was all around the correct definition of ${\gamma}_5$ matrix. Though I've attached an article which tries to solve the mathematical inconvenience! This means personally could not see any mathematical problem with it. But even in that case, my interest was merely physical objections, like symmetry violations, etc. But thanks for your answer. | |
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:48 | comment | added | Mozibur Ullah | @Bastam Tajik: I didn't think that you had said that and nor did I imply that in my answer. What I was simply pointing out was that dimensional regularisation had a rigorous mathematical definition, (contra your assertion). | |
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:44 | comment | added | Bastam Tajik | I did not say it's the "only" mathematically correct one. | |
| Apr 21, 2021 at 22:42 | history | answered | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |